The new Speed Concept -- Trek really thought of everything on this bike.
- Trek Speed Concept Di2 Manual Review
- Trek Speed Concept Di2 Manual Instructions
- Trek Speed Concept Di2 Manual Review
- Trek Speed Concept Di2 Manual
Frame
Maybe the most talked-about feature of the original Speed Concept - after the integrated brakes, and the wicked aerobar - was its novel use of truncated airfoil shapes on the frame members. There's been a lot of talk about them, and firms like Cervelo claim Trek might be over-using them - that is, using them in places where another shape might be better. But it's hard to deny that the Speed Concept is a fast bike, and even its competitors have to admit it has pretty amazing performance at yaw. The 2014 version of the bike retains the KVF (Kammtail Virtual Foil) shapes pioneered by the original bike, and keeps them in most of the same places. However, for the tri-specific version of the bike, the front fork has been swapped for a full-foil version that doesn't have truncated rear ends.
That theme of incremental improvements is one that carries all over the bike. Little details like the seat binder, now a two-bolt rear-address mechanism, bring back tried-and-true methods of getting things done. The single-bolt wedge design caused some problems with the original bike, and although they were largely solved, Trek decided that the reliability of the two-bolt version was better than the novel wedge design. Honestly, I liked the wedge a lot, but the two-bolt version is just fine. The Cervelo P5, Specialized Shiv, and now Trek Speed Concept all use that type of binder.
That theme of incremental improvements is one that carries all over the bike. Little details like the seat binder, now a two-bolt rear-address mechanism, bring back tried-and-true methods of getting things done. The single-bolt wedge design caused some problems with the original bike, and although they were largely solved, Trek decided that the reliability of the two-bolt version was better than the novel wedge design. Honestly, I liked the wedge a lot, but the two-bolt version is just fine. The Cervelo P5, Specialized Shiv, and now Trek Speed Concept all use that type of binder.
![Trek speed concept di2 manual instructions Trek speed concept di2 manual instructions](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/95/cf/d2/95cfd2522006fce1fa85ed32684e56b4.jpg)
Trek Speed Concept Di2 Manual Review
Speed Concept 9.9. Download bike photo. Details Support You might also like: Share the ride. Join us at the water cooler to catch up on the latest and swap stories with Trek fans from around the world. Join the conversation. You, Trek, the world's greatest athletes, 140 characters. Limber up those fingers and go. Watch the latest. Trek Speed Concept Di2 Internal Battery Mount. To be used with the Trek Speed Concept 9 2014 Seatpost, the Trek Speed Concept Di2 Internal Battery Mount is a seamless, neat and affordable means of carrying your Di2 internal battery. The mount slots securely in to the seatpost, preventing the battery from rattling about or becoming dislodged. Dec 21, 2011 Yes, and you can make it look just as clean as on any other tri bike. I found it was easier to run Di2 on a Speed Concept 7 series than on my own 9.9. Your Trek dealer can download the Di2 manual from the Trek Tech site. Re: DI2 on a Speed Concept 7? Carl In reply to Quote Reply. Dec 21, 11 1:27. Trek Speed Concept Di2 Internal Battery Mount. To be used with the Trek Speed Concept 9 2014 Seatpost, the Trek Speed Concept Di2 Internal Battery Mount is a seamless, neat and affordable means of carrying your Di2 internal battery. The mount slots securely in to the seatpost, preventing the battery from rattling about or becoming dislodged. The concept is the same as at the rear — let the carbon flex more vertically with fore and aft movement while restricting side-to-side movement. Trek Speed Concept Di2 Installation. Scott Bike Instructions Read/Download. 2015 Spark Series Bicycle pdf manual download. Making it easy for users to download and view only their top. Adobe creative suite 4 cs4 master collection keygen mac.
It's an absolutely gorgeous bike. Its one aesthetic flaw is this funny gap behind the fork in front of the down tube.
The frame's geometry and fit adjustment, already excellent on the original bike, have been improved even further. The bike now allows for lower minimum stack across all models, allowing a wider range of fit than before. My chief complaint about the original bike was that the aerobar hardware didn't let you get low enough for some riders. Looks like Trek was really listening to that kind of complaint, and the new bar does just about anything you could want. As mentioned earlier, it's a little tricky to adjust, but you can generally put the pads wherever you want. The seat tube still telescopes at roughly 78 degrees, and the flip-flop seatpost lets you adjust that forward to about 80 degrees, or backwards to about 76 degrees. The original bike could be made to fit just about every rider out there. The new bike picks up most of the people that the old design left behind. It's really a very good bike from a fit perspective.
The one change I don't like quite as much is the new saddle clamp hardware. The original saddle clamp was the irreproachable single-bolt side-address clamp that Bontrager has been making for years. One bolt lets you easily adjust saddle setback and tilt angle simultaneously. It worked very well. Smaart v7 keygen. A lot of bikes still use that kind of system, including the Specialied Shiv, Cervelo P-series, and more. Trek has now moved to a bottom-address clamp that uses two bolts to adjust setback and tilt. And I really don't like it. It works, sure. But it's more difficult to get the job done, it uses an extra bolt, and I don't see why on earth they needed to make the change. Were they trying to save weight? Find some aerodynamic advantage? I don't know. Cacti netgear switch template. But I'd trade back for the original hardware in a heartbeat.
The one change I don't like quite as much is the new saddle clamp hardware. The original saddle clamp was the irreproachable single-bolt side-address clamp that Bontrager has been making for years. One bolt lets you easily adjust saddle setback and tilt angle simultaneously. It worked very well. Smaart v7 keygen. A lot of bikes still use that kind of system, including the Specialied Shiv, Cervelo P-series, and more. Trek has now moved to a bottom-address clamp that uses two bolts to adjust setback and tilt. And I really don't like it. It works, sure. But it's more difficult to get the job done, it uses an extra bolt, and I don't see why on earth they needed to make the change. Were they trying to save weight? Find some aerodynamic advantage? I don't know. Cacti netgear switch template. But I'd trade back for the original hardware in a heartbeat.
Other Details
Trek Speed Concept Di2 Manual Instructions
There are so many aspects of this bike that deserve mention, because Trek really went to town refining all aspects of the original bike when they redesigned it for 2014. To save you some reading time, I'll address them in list form instead of devoting a paragraph to each. But it's not meant to imply that any of these things are trivial, only that there's so much Ti 84 plus emulator free mac. going on with this bike that I wanted to condense it a little bit. https://luckwaysgoodsayclevercasino-distributiontoylmj.peatix.com.
Trek Speed Concept Di2 Manual Review
- Cable port: the original used a very annoying little rubber grommet to collect the cables where they enter the frame. Now it's a carbon structure built into the top tube. Excellent.
- Cable routing: slightly easier to route cables just due to the geometry, and the size of the holes at the BB area. You can route mechanical or electronic cables, but you'll have an easier time adjuting the aerobar fit if you're using electronic. Sadly, the new Di2 front junctions don't fit into the stem any more, but it's not too hard to find a nice spot for them.
- Draft Box (behind the seat post): the new mounting system is awesome. It's MUCH lighter, easier to use, and mechanically more reliable than the original. Now you can leave the mount on your bike all the time (it weight about 10g), and then just snap on the Draft Box when you want it. Brilliant.
- Speed Fin (BB brake cover): very nice. It's just one more little detail that improves aerodynamics by a tiny amount, but there's no reason not to have it.
- Rear Brake: it's been improved with simpler design, and stance-width adjustment screws like the front brake. Awesome.
- Speed Box 2 (behind the stem): we didn't receive one of these, but it looks like a much-improved version of the top tube storage unit of the original Speed Concept. It integrates perfectly with the shape of the bike, and looks like a good storage option for this bike.
- New Project One options: some sweet new paint options, like the U5 Vapor Coat, lets you have just about anything you want. Sadly, the U5 (which is almost like having a nude carbon bike) is the most expensive options. Too bad you have to pay THAT much more to NOT have paint. There are also some great new options in the wheel department, more aerobar options, etc.
- Sport-specific design: In order to better serve triathletes, Trek apparently optimized the aerodynamics of the Speed Concept to best match the yaw angles that triathletes experience during a typical Ironman race course. But with the ridiculously-low frontal area Trek was able to achieve on the new design, the low-yaw performance is still very impressive, and will be an excellent choice for the typical time trialist for whom the average wind angle tends to be lower than it does for the triathlete.
- BB90: same bottom-bracket standard as the original bike. It's not my favorite, but it does work well as long as you don't want to use a boutique crank like Lightning.
The new Draft Box - in every way better than its predecessor.
Trek Speed Concept Di2 Manual
Overall, it's becoming hard to improve on these machines. The Cervelo P5, a bike with its own unique set of design cues and aero philosophies, exhibited VERY similar drag in the wind tunnel, according to Trek's own test. There's one little aesthetic blemish on the bike, and that's where the fork crown meets the down tube. That interface just looks wacky, and it's because the complete structure doesn't hug the front wheel like virtually every other top-end bike does. The Cervelo P5 and New P3, the Felt IA, DA, and B2, the Specialized Shiv -- all of these bikes hug the down tube right up against the wheel. The Speed Concept has a funky little hole in this area, most likely due to UCI regulations. But when crafting the tri-specific version, why not make the fork fill up this area? https://downyfiles675.weebly.com/play-super-hot-online-free.html. On the other hand, Trek took advantage of the weird little space, and put a rubber bumper there that acts as a steering lock, and prevents any of the frame members from scraping the fork. Anyway, this detail is a small one, but I figured it deserved a mention. It also indicates how difficult it is to find faults with this bike.
Hit the jump for my conclusions on this very lovable machine.
Hit the jump for my conclusions on this very lovable machine.